Paid to Protest. Who Needs Principles?
I always thought, when viewing a protest, that those protesters were driven to march, chant, or show their displeasure for perceived injustices because of principles they held and felt were being violated. Whether I agreed with their position or not I always respected their right and courage to make their feelings known through the legal right to assemble and protest.
Now this story comes out and I suddenly feel uncomfortably naive…
It appears the AFL-CIO and Occupy DC organizers had plans to protest outside the Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington DC this weekend. But getting people to show up and protest the politically conservative folks inside turned out to be a difficult chore. So difficult in fact, they resorted to paying $60 to anyone willing to take the money and come march around the venue even though they had no clue what they were marching for or against…
This is another example of style over substance when it comes to the left and their thinking. Padding the numbers makes your cause look feeble, inept, and unsupported. I’ll never look at another protest the same again and I’ll always wonder how many of the protesters know what they’re there for or even care if there’s cash coming.
If you’re a dues paying union member are you OK with your money being used this way?
So much for principles.
- ‘Occupy CPAC’ Protester Paid $60 a Day (michellemalkin.com)
- Union Goons Crash CPAC (rogueoperator.wordpress.com)
- Breitbart To Occupiers: “Stop Raping People!” (buzzfeed.com)
- CPAC Speaker Goads Pro-Union, Occupy Protesters (huffingtonpost.com)